Breeding Bird Atlas 2 Species Accounts
- Nearly ubiquitous and likely declining
Many Massachusetts residents have awakened in the morning to the harsh cacophony created by European Starlings. This introduced species has become one of the commonest birds throughout Massachusetts in a remarkably short time, and it is often viewed as a nuisance and a pest. As a cavity nester that often usurps nest sites from other species, the starling has wreaked havoc on some native cavity-nesting birds (Cabe 1993).
Historic StatusBlame Eugene Scheiffelin for the presence of this species in the New World. In the late 1800s, he spearheaded the effort to bring every bird that was mentioned in Shakespeare’s plays to America. Approximately a dozen attempts were made to establish the European Starling, including one at Worcester in 1884, and at Forest Park, Springfield, in 1897, “but eventually they all disappeared,” said Reginald Heber Howe and Glover Morrill Allen four years later (Howe & Allen 1901). An introduction attempted in New York City was successful, and by 1908 a starling was seen in Essex County. “There is often a possibility that any introduced bird or mammal that will bring no money to the pocket of the hunter or marketman will become a pest,” said Edward Howe Forbush in Useful Birds and Their Protection (Forbush 1907). “We have had such an experience with the ‘English’ sparrow, and we may yet regret the recent importation of the European Starling.” How right he was.
Atlas 1 DistributionWhen the Atlas 1 surveys were done, the European Starling’s distribution had reached near-epic proportions in Massachusetts, especially for a species that had been in the state fewer than 70 years. Equally at home in bustling cities, quiet suburbs, and rural areas, starlings prospered from the Berkshires to Nantucket and most places in between, posting 95% block occupancy statewide. Only the deepest, most intact forests of the state were free from breeding starlings, and the birds’ apparent absence from several blocks in the Worcester Plateau region is most likely attributable to uneven block coverage during Atlas 1. The species was truly ubiquitous in the eastern regions, failing to appear only in a few aberrant blocks and some locations on the islands.
Atlas 2 Distribution and ChangeEuropean Starlings were showing negative trends in abundance and distribution both here and in their native range during Atlas 2, but overall the species’ footprint only changed slightly, with a drop of 3% in the state. In western and central Massachusetts, gaps appeared particularly in the Berkshire Highlands, but generally small fluctuations in occupancy did not meaningfully impact the remarkable persistence of starlings on the landscape. Small declines in the Coastal Plains and Bristol/Narragansett Lowlands and an incremental increase in the Boston Basin were likewise noted. Cape Cod and the Islands was the only region to drop below 80% stable occupancy.
Atlas 1 Map
Atlas 2 Map
Atlas Change Map
|Atlas 1||Atlas 2||Change|
|Ecoregion||# Blocks||% Blocks||% of Range||# Blocks||% Blocks||% of Range||Change in # Blocks||Change in % Blocks|
|Marble Valleys/Housatonic Valley||39||100.0||4.2||39||100.0||4.1||0||0.0|
|Lower Berkshire Hills||27||96.4||2.9||27||87.1||2.9||-1||-3.7|
|Connecticut River Valley||55||98.2||6.0||63||96.9||6.7||1||2.1|
|Lower Worcester Plateau||64||86.5||7.0||69||86.3||7.3||1||1.9|
|S. New England Coastal Plains and Hills||266||98.5||28.9||275||97.2||29.2||-3||-1.3|
|Bristol and Narragansett Lowlands||105||99.1||11.4||106||93.0||11.3||-5||-5.0|
|Cape Cod and Islands||119||87.5||12.9||114||79.2||12.1||-11||-9.2|